tableanna.blogg.se

Rittenhouse shooting drone video
Rittenhouse shooting drone video













Rittenhouse shooting drone video trial#

"It's just a shame that irresponsible statements are being made," the judge said of comments in a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel story from law school professors.The second day of deliberations in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was halted as jurors asked to re-watch several videos presented as evidence, including drone footage that's at the center of the defense's call for a mistrial. Schroeder said he hadn't had a chance to read the motion because he had just received it and wanted to give the state a chance to weigh in. The judge also complained about criticism that he had yet to rule on the earlier mistrial request. He took exception to news stories about his decisions not to allow the men Rittenhouse shot to be called "victims" and to let Rittenhouse draw the lots that determined which jurors were alternates. "That's a losing argument for sure."Įarlier in the day, the judge criticized news coverage of the case and second-guessing from legal experts in the media, saying he would "think long and hard" about allowing televised trials in the future. "You can't just say, 'The state gave me a lower-quality video and therefore I get a mistrial,'" Meyn said. Julius Kim, a Milwaukee-based defense attorney who has been watching the case, said a mistrial could be declared even if the judge finds it was an honest mistake or a technical problem.īut to win a mistrial, the defense will have to meet a high bar and explain to the judge why what happened actually hurt Rittenhouse, said Ion Meyn, an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School. But if he is found guilty, a mistrial ruling would essentially void the verdict. If Rittenhouse is acquitted, the issue will be moot. He said the mistrial request will have to be addressed if there is a guilty verdict. The judge said he had "qualms" about admitting the video during the trial, but because it had already been shown in court, he would allow the jury to rewatch it during deliberations.īut if it turns out the video should not have been admitted into evidence, "it's going to be ugly," Schroeder warned. "We're focusing too heavily on a technological glitch," prosecutor James Kraus said.

rittenhouse shooting drone video

Prosecutors told the judge Wednesday that the jury saw the highest-quality version during the trial and that it was not the state's fault that the file size got smaller when received by the defense. That's why people working with video footage are careful to check file size, length and other details after making a copy to ensure the new version is what they wanted, he added. But the key moment in the video is hard to decipher because of how far away the drone was and how small a figure Rittenhouse is in the frame.Ī smaller file size or lower-resolution video file is fuzzier and grainier, particularly if played on a larger screen, said Dennis Keeling, adjunct professor in the cinema and television arts department at Columbia College Chicago. The prosecution contends the video proves Rittenhouse lied on the stand when he said he didn't point his rifle at protesters. The same footage prompted heated dispute earlier in the trial over technical questions of whether a still image taken from the video was distorted when it was enlarged. The dispute over the video erupted after the jurors asked to rewatch footage on Day 2 of their deliberations.ĭefense attorneys said they would object to the jury viewing the drone video. He could get life in prison if convicted of the most serious charge against him. The case has become a flashpoint in the debate over guns, racial injustice, vigilantism and self-defense in the U.S. Rittenhouse is white, as were those shot. He shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz, now 28. Rittenhouse, 18, is on trial on homicide and attempted homicide charges for killing two men and wounding a third with an AR-style semi-automatic rifle during a tumultuous night of protests over the police shooting of Jacob Blake, Black man, by a white police officer. Rittenhouse, a then-17-year-old former police youth cadet, said he went to Kenosha to protect property from rioters.

rittenhouse shooting drone video rittenhouse shooting drone video

Prosecutors said the footage showed him pointing his rifle at protesters before the shooting erupted.

rittenhouse shooting drone video

Personal Loans for 670 Credit Score or LowerĪt issue was a piece of drone video that prosecutors showed to the jury in closing arguments in a bid to undermine Rittenhouse's self-defense claim and portray him as the instigator of the bloodshed in Kenosha in the summer of 2020. Personal Loans for 580 Credit Score or Lower Best Debt Consolidation Loans for Bad Credit













Rittenhouse shooting drone video